🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios introduced a fresh playlist titled Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but includes several notable adjustments:

• Each team has just 8 real players, with the rest filled by 32 bots.
• Activities performed by real players grant complete experience points, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State.
• Elements like Player tags, achievements, and stat tracking are disabled.

So essentially, this mode delivers on its title: it's a casual take of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think it's a good idea, as it provides more options for gamers looking for alternative methods to have fun with the title. But, if video games have taught us anything, it is that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, a lot of Battlefield 6 fans are mad.

Community Responses: From Fury to Support

"People want real players. Don't repeat the mistakes of your rivals," states one reply to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking concept," comments a different user. At the same time, in community forums, a player remarks, "I have no idea where we are headed with this title," while another details all the issues they believe to be broken in the game: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We do not require this bot mode."

However, amid the criticism, there are players sharing how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to practice, human participants prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are players who actually go outside and can't play this game 24/7. Let them find a middle ground," adds a different comment. A response on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with limited time, this is perfect for me," while someone else applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Concerns and Player Feedback

All that said, there are constructive reasons to criticize Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have pointed out that it could increase queue times more extended for different playlists because of the sheer number of options currently available. On a similar note, certain regions already encounter AI-filled matches in the current modes. Additionally, it appears a little backwards that the mode does not begin without a required amount of real players, despite it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Finally, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide full XP, even against bots, but that got canned when they tried to eliminate bot farms from the mode. Thus Casual Breakthrough seems like the player base compromising in the middle, as per forum feedback. A different user labels this mode as the devs "dropping the ball so hard, I had so much fun in the first couple of days, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Be Made?

Should Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something to date with Battlefield 6, it is that they're paying attention and acting on feedback. Assignments being too difficult got fixed rapidly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data indicates this new playlist is underperforming to their expectations, they will not hesitate to change it again.